EPYC 7343 vs Ryzen 5 2600H

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 2600H
2018
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
5.23
EPYC 7343
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 190 Watt
28.46
+444%

EPYC 7343 outperforms Ryzen 5 2600H by a whopping 444% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 2600H and EPYC 7343 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1211174
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data13.20
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD EPYC
Power efficiency10.6013.66
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge (2017−2018)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date10 September 2018 (6 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,565

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 2600H and EPYC 7343 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads832
Base clock speed3.3 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.9 GHz
Multiplier3232
L1 cache384 KB1 MB
L2 cache2 MB8 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm+
Die size209.78 mm24x 81 mm2
Number of transistors4950 Million16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 2600H and EPYC 7343 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFP5SP3
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt190 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2600H and EPYC 7343. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2600H and EPYC 7343 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2600H and EPYC 7343. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size32 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2600H and EPYC 7343.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes12128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 2600H 5.23
EPYC 7343 28.46
+444%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 2600H 8002
EPYC 7343 43561
+444%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.23 28.46
Recency 10 September 2018 12 January 2021
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 8 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 190 Watt

Ryzen 5 2600H has 322.2% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7343, on the other hand, has a 444.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7343 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 2600H in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 5 2600H is a notebook processor while EPYC 7343 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 2600H and EPYC 7343, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 2600H
Ryzen 5 2600H
AMD EPYC 7343
EPYC 7343

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 11 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 2600H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 25 votes

Rate EPYC 7343 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 2600H or EPYC 7343, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.