Celeron N4020 vs Ryzen 5 2500X
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 2500X outperforms Celeron N4020 by a whopping 513% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 2500X and Celeron N4020 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1089 | 2467 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 92 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | Intel Gemini Lake |
Power efficiency | 8.68 | 15.35 |
Architecture codename | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) |
Release date | 10 September 2018 (6 years ago) | 4 November 2019 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 2500X and Celeron N4020 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 8 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | 15 MHz |
Multiplier | 36 | no data |
L1 cache | 384 KB | no data |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 4 MB |
L3 cache | 8 MB | 4 MB |
Chip lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | 213 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
Number of transistors | 4800 Million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 2500X and Celeron N4020 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | AM4 | FCBGA1090 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2500X and Celeron N4020. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2 |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Speed Shift | no data | - |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
Idle States | no data | + |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Smart Response | no data | - |
GPIO | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Ryzen 5 2500X and Celeron N4020 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
EDB | no data | + |
Secure Key | no data | + |
MPX | - | + |
Identity Protection | - | + |
SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® ME |
OS Guard | no data | + |
Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2500X and Celeron N4020 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2500X and Celeron N4020. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR4 |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 8 GB |
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | - | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
Max video memory | - | 8 GB |
Quick Sync Video | - | + |
Graphics max frequency | - | 650 MHz |
Execution Units | - | 12 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 5 2500X and Celeron N4020 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | - | 3 |
eDP | - | + |
DisplayPort | - | + |
HDMI | - | + |
MIPI-DSI | - | + |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen 5 2500X and Celeron N4020 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
4K resolution support | - | + |
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | - | 4096x2160@30Hz |
Max resolution over eDP | - | 4096x2160@60Hz |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | - | 4096x2160@60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Ryzen 5 2500X and Celeron N4020 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | - | 12 |
OpenGL | - | 4.4 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2500X and Celeron N4020.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 2.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 20 | 6 |
USB revision | no data | 2.0/3.0 |
Total number of SATA ports | no data | 2 |
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | no data | 2 |
Number of USB ports | no data | 8 |
Integrated LAN | no data | - |
UART | no data | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 6.19 | 1.01 |
Recency | 10 September 2018 | 4 November 2019 |
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Threads | 8 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 6 Watt |
Ryzen 5 2500X has a 512.9% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron N4020, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 983.3% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen 5 2500X is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N4020 in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen 5 2500X is a desktop processor while Celeron N4020 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 2500X and Celeron N4020, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.