Celeron N4020 vs Ryzen 5 2500X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 2500X
2018
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
6.19
+513%

Ryzen 5 2500X outperforms Celeron N4020 by a whopping 513% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 2500X and Celeron N4020 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10892467
Place by popularitynot in top-10092
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5Intel Gemini Lake
Power efficiency8.6815.35
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2019)Gemini Lake Refresh (2019)
Release date10 September 2018 (6 years ago)4 November 2019 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 2500X and Celeron N4020 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.6 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s15 MHz
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache384 KBno data
L2 cache2 MB4 MB
L3 cache8 MB4 MB
Chip lithography12 nm14 nm
Die size213 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors4800 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 2500X and Celeron N4020 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4FCBGA1090
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2500X and Celeron N4020. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 2500X and Celeron N4020 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2500X and Celeron N4020 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2500X and Celeron N4020. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size64 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel UHD Graphics 600
Max video memory-8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequency-650 MHz
Execution Units-12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 5 2500X and Celeron N4020 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported-3
eDP-+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSI-+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen 5 2500X and Celeron N4020 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support-+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4-4096x2160@30Hz
Max resolution over eDP-4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort-4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen 5 2500X and Celeron N4020 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX-12
OpenGL-4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2500X and Celeron N4020.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes206
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 2500X 6.19
+513%
Celeron N4020 1.01

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 2500X 9469
+511%
Celeron N4020 1551

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 5 2500X 1126
+228%
Celeron N4020 343

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 5 2500X 3842
+602%
Celeron N4020 547

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.19 1.01
Recency 10 September 2018 4 November 2019
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 6 Watt

Ryzen 5 2500X has a 512.9% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron N4020, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 983.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 2500X is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N4020 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 2500X is a desktop processor while Celeron N4020 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 2500X and Celeron N4020, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
Ryzen 5 2500X
Intel Celeron N4020
Celeron N4020

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 160 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 2500X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1751 vote

Rate Celeron N4020 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 2500X or Celeron N4020, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.