Opteron 248 vs Ryzen 5 1600X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 1600X
2017
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
8.22
+2640%
Opteron 248
2003
1 core / 1 thread, 89 Watt
0.30

Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms Opteron 248 by a whopping 2640% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 1600X and Opteron 248 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9253116
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.53no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5no data
Power efficiency8.150.32
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)SledgeHammer (2003−2005)
Release date11 April 2017 (7 years ago)November 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249$12

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 1600X and Opteron 248 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads121
Base clock speed3.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache96K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm130 nm
Die size192 mm2193 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million106 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 1600X and Opteron 248 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketAM4940
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Opteron 248. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Opteron 248 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Opteron 248. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Opteron 248.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes24no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 1600X 8.22
+2640%
Opteron 248 0.30

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 1600X 13055
+2643%
Opteron 248 476

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.22 0.30
Physical cores 6 1
Threads 12 1
Chip lithography 14 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 89 Watt

Ryzen 5 1600X has a 2640% higher aggregate performance score, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

Opteron 248, on the other hand, has 6.7% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 1600X is our recommended choice as it beats the Opteron 248 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 1600X is a desktop processor while Opteron 248 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 1600X and Opteron 248, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Ryzen 5 1600X
AMD Opteron 248
Opteron 248

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 919 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 1600X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Opteron 248 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 1600X or Opteron 248, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.