Ryzen 3 7320C vs Ryzen 5 1600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 1600
2017
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
7.96
+42.4%

Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Ryzen 3 7320C by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 1600 and Ryzen 3 7320C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking9301131
Place by popularity51not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.16no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Mendocino (Zen 2) (2022−2023)
Release date16 March 2017 (7 years ago)20 September 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$219no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 1600 and Ryzen 3 7320C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads128
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier32no data
L1 cache576 KB256 KB
L2 cache3 MB2 MB
L3 cache16 MB4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm6 nm
Die size213 mm2no data
Number of transistors4800 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 1600 and Ryzen 3 7320C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketSocket AM4no data
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Ryzen 3 7320C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Ryzen 3 7320C are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Ryzen 3 7320C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon 610M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Ryzen 3 7320C.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 1600 7.96
+42.4%
Ryzen 3 7320C 5.59

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 1600 12280
+42.6%
Ryzen 3 7320C 8614

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.96 5.59
Recency 16 March 2017 20 September 2022
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 12 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 5 1600 has a 42.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Ryzen 3 7320C, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 1600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 7320C in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 1600 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 3 7320C is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 1600 and Ryzen 3 7320C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Ryzen 5 1600
AMD Ryzen 3 7320C
Ryzen 3 7320C

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 5649 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 10 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 7320C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 1600 or Ryzen 3 7320C, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.