Atom E680 vs Ryzen 5 1600
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 1600 and Atom E680 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 952 | not rated |
Place by popularity | 44 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 4.50 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | no data |
Power efficiency | 11.25 | no data |
Architecture codename | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Tunnel Creek (2010) |
Release date | 11 April 2017 (7 years ago) | 14 September 2010 (14 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $219 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 1600 and Atom E680 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 12 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 32 | no data |
L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 45 nm |
Die size | 192 mm2 | 26 mm2 |
Number of transistors | 4,800 million | 47 million |
64 bit support | + | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 1600 and Atom E680 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | AM4 | Intel BGA 676 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 4 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Atom E680. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | no data |
AES-NI | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Atom E680 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Atom E680. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR2 |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | - | Intel GMA 600 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Atom E680.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 20 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 11 April 2017 | 14 September 2010 |
Physical cores | 6 | 1 |
Threads | 12 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 45 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 4 Watt |
Ryzen 5 1600 has an age advantage of 6 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.
Atom E680, on the other hand, has 1525% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 1600 and Atom E680. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 5 1600 is a desktop processor while Atom E680 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 1600 and Atom E680, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.