Athlon II X4 640 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.40
+212%
Athlon II X4 640
2010
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.41

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G outperforms Athlon II X4 640 by a whopping 212% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Athlon II X4 640 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13482216
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.92
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3no data
Power efficiency6.411.40
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2019)Propus (2009−2011)
Release date30 September 2019 (5 years ago)11 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$80

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Athlon II X4 640 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache384 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB0 KB
Chip lithography12 nm45 nm
Die size209.78 mm2169 mm2
Number of transistors4940 Million300 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Athlon II X4 640 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSocket AM4AM3
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Athlon II X4 640. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Athlon II X4 640 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Athlon II X4 640. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon Vega 8no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Athlon II X4 640.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G 4.40
+212%
Athlon II X4 640 1.41

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G 6989
+211%
Athlon II X4 640 2245

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.40 1.41
Recency 30 September 2019 11 May 2010
Chip lithography 12 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has a 212.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 275% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X4 640 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Athlon II X4 640, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
AMD Athlon II X4 640
Athlon II X4 640

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 147 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 1390 votes

Rate Athlon II X4 640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G or Athlon II X4 640, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.