Atom x7425E vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U outperforms Atom x7425E by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U and Atom x7425E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1508 | 1550 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 3 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 22.78 | 27.29 |
| Architecture codename | Raven Ridge (2017−2018) | Gracemont (2023) |
| Release date | 8 January 2018 (6 years ago) | 3 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U and Atom x7425E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Multiplier | 20 | no data |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 209.78 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4950 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U and Atom x7425E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | FP5 | Intel BGA 1744 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 12 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U and Atom x7425E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U and Atom x7425E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U and Atom x7425E are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U and Atom x7425E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 38.397 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1100 MHz) | Intel UHD Graphics 24EU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U and Atom x7425E.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 12 | 9 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.61 | 3.46 |
| Recency | 8 January 2018 | 3 January 2023 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 12 Watt |
Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U has a 4.3% higher aggregate performance score.
Atom x7425E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U and Atom x7425E.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U and Atom x7425E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
