Xeon E3-1220 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
2018
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.29
+77.3%
Xeon E3-1220
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 80 Watt
2.42

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G outperforms Xeon E3-1220 by an impressive 77% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Xeon E3-1220 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13601763
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.51
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3no data
Power efficiency6.252.86
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date10 May 2018 (6 years ago)3 April 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$395

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Xeon E3-1220 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speedno data3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache384 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size209.78 mm2216 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data69 °C
Number of transistors4950 Million1,160 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Xeon E3-1220 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSocket AM4LGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Xeon E3-1220. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
FDIno data-
Fast Memory Accessno data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Xeon E3-1220 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Identity Protection-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Xeon E3-1220 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Xeon E3-1220. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/s21 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Xeon E3-1220.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes1220

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G 4.29
+77.3%
Xeon E3-1220 2.42

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G 6819
+77.3%
Xeon E3-1220 3847

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.29 2.42
Recency 10 May 2018 3 April 2011
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 80 Watt

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G has a 77.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 23.1% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1220 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G is a desktop processor while Xeon E3-1220 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Xeon E3-1220, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
Intel Xeon E3-1220
Xeon E3-1220

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 86 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 231 vote

Rate Xeon E3-1220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G or Xeon E3-1220, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.