Apple M1 Max vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
2018
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.29
Apple M1 Max
2021
10 cores / 10 threads, 2060 Watt
13.90
+224%

Apple M1 Max outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G by a whopping 224% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Apple M1 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1358526
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3Apple M-Series
Power efficiency6.25no data
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)no data
Release date10 May 2018 (6 years ago)18 October 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Apple M1 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads410
Base clock speedno data2.06 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.22 GHz
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache384 KB2.9 MB
L2 cache2 MB28 MB
L3 cache4 MB48 MB
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die size209.78 mm2no data
Number of transistors4950 Million57000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Apple M1 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketSocket AM4no data
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt2060 ‑ 3220 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Apple M1 Max. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Apple M1 Max are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Apple M1 Max. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933no data
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Apple M1 Max.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes12no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G 4.29
Apple M1 Max 13.90
+224%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G 6819
Apple M1 Max 22080
+224%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.29 13.90
Recency 10 May 2018 18 October 2021
Physical cores 4 10
Threads 4 10
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 2060 Watt

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G has 3069.2% lower power consumption.

Apple M1 Max, on the other hand, has a 224% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 150% more physical cores and 150% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Apple M1 Max is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G is a desktop processor while Apple M1 Max is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Apple M1 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
Apple M1 Max
M1 Max

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 86 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 684 votes

Rate Apple M1 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G or Apple M1 Max, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.