Apple M1 Max vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
Aggregate performance score
Apple M1 Max outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G by a whopping 224% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Apple M1 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1355 | 524 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 3 | Apple M-Series |
| Power efficiency | 6.24 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | no data |
| Release date | 10 May 2018 (6 years ago) | 18 October 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Apple M1 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 10 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.06 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.22 GHz |
| Multiplier | 35 | no data |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 2.9 MB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 28 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 48 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 209.78 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4950 Million | 57000 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Apple M1 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | Socket AM4 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 2060 ‑ 3220 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Apple M1 Max. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Apple M1 Max are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Apple M1 Max. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Apple M1 Max.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 12 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.45 | 14.43 |
| Recency | 10 May 2018 | 18 October 2021 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 10 |
| Threads | 4 | 10 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 2060 Watt |
Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G has 3069.2% lower power consumption.
Apple M1 Max, on the other hand, has a 224.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 150% more physical cores and 150% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
The Apple M1 Max is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G is a desktop processor while Apple M1 Max is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Apple M1 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
