Iris Graphics 48 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Iris Graphics 48 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1298not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3Intel Iris Graphics
Power efficiency6.62no data
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Gen9
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Iris Graphics 48 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)no data
Threads4no data
Base clock speed3.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz0.3 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)no data
L3 cache8 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm0.014 μm 1.4e-5 mm
Die size192 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Iris Graphics 48 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketAM4no data
Power consumption (TDP)65 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Iris Graphics 48. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Iris Graphics 48 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Iris Graphics 48. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelno data
Maximum memory size64 GB65,536 MB 67,108,864 KB 68,719,476,736 B 0.0625 TiB 64 GB
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Iris Graphics 48.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Pros & cons summary


We couldn't decide between Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Iris Graphics 48. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 is a server/workstation processor while Iris Graphics 48 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Iris Graphics 48, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
Intel Iris Graphics 48
Iris Graphics 48

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 193 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.6 5 votes

Rate Iris Graphics 48 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 or Iris Graphics 48, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.