Celeron M U3400 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Celeron M U3400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1300not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3Intel Celeron M
Power efficiency6.62no data
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)24 May 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Celeron M U3400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz1.06 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s2500 MHz
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size192 mm281+114 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million382+177 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Celeron M U3400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketAM4BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Celeron M U3400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Celeron M U3400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Celeron M U3400 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Celeron M U3400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Celeron M U3400.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 June 2017 24 May 2010
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 18 Watt

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 has an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M U3400, on the other hand, has 261.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Celeron M U3400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron M U3400 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Celeron M U3400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
Intel Celeron M U3400
Celeron M U3400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 193 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 4 votes

Rate Celeron M U3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 or Celeron M U3400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.