Steam Deck OLED APU vs Ryzen 3 5425U
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 3 5425U outperforms Steam Deck OLED APU by an impressive 56% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 3 5425U and Steam Deck OLED APU processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 998 | 1303 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | AMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000) | Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU) |
Power efficiency | 45.15 | 28.94 |
Architecture codename | Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022) | Van Gogh (Custom) (2023) |
Release date | 6 January 2022 (2 years ago) | 9 November 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 3 5425U and Steam Deck OLED APU basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 8 | 8 |
Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4.1 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 256 KB |
L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB |
L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 4 MB |
Chip lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm |
Die size | 180 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 10,700 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 3 5425U and Steam Deck OLED APU compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | FP6 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 5425U and Steam Deck OLED APU. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 5425U and Steam Deck OLED APU are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 5425U and Steam Deck OLED APU. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1600 MHz) | AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU (1000 - 1600 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 5425U and Steam Deck OLED APU.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 7.16 | 4.59 |
Recency | 6 January 2022 | 9 November 2023 |
Chip lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm |
Ryzen 3 5425U has a 56% higher aggregate performance score.
Steam Deck OLED APU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.
The Ryzen 3 5425U is our recommended choice as it beats the Steam Deck OLED APU in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 5425U and Steam Deck OLED APU, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.