FX-4170 vs Ryzen 3 4300U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 4300U
2020
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
4.68
+145%
FX-4170
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 125 Watt
1.91

Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms FX-4170 by a whopping 145% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 4300U and FX-4170 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12731960
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)no data
Power efficiency17.721.45
Architecture codenameRenoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date6 January 2020 (4 years ago)27 February 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 4300U and FX-4170 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.7 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.3 GHz
Multiplier27no data
L1 cache128K (per core)192 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)4096 KB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)8192 KB
Chip lithography7 nm32 nm
Die size156 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C61 °C
Number of transistors9800 Million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.1875 V - Max: 1.4125 V

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 4300U and FX-4170 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP6AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 4300U and FX-4170. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 4300U and FX-4170 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 4300U and FX-4170. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth68.27 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 5 ( - 1400 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 4300U and FX-4170.

PCIe version3.0n/a

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 4300U 4.68
+145%
FX-4170 1.91

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 4300U 7440
+145%
FX-4170 3034

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 3 4300U 1267
+173%
FX-4170 464

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 3 4300U 3399
+183%
FX-4170 1201

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.68 1.91
Recency 6 January 2020 27 February 2012
Chip lithography 7 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 125 Watt

Ryzen 3 4300U has a 145% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 357.1% more advanced lithography process, and 733.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 4300U is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-4170 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 3 4300U is a notebook processor while FX-4170 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 4300U and FX-4170, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 4300U
Ryzen 3 4300U
AMD FX-4170
FX-4170

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 953 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 4300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 80 votes

Rate FX-4170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 4300U or FX-4170, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.