Ryzen 7 8840HS vs Ryzen 3 3250U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 3250U
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.40
Ryzen 7 8840HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
15.23
+535%

Ryzen 7 8840HS outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U by a whopping 535% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 3250U and Ryzen 7 8840HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1783461
Place by popularity80not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3no data
Power efficiency15.1451.48
Architecture codenamePicasso (2019−2022)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
Release date6 January 2020 (4 years ago)6 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 3250U and Ryzen 7 8840HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed2.6 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz5.1 GHz
Multiplier26no data
L1 cache128K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm4 nm
Die size246 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C100 °C
Number of transistors4500 Million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 3250U and Ryzen 7 8840HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP5FP8
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 3250U and Ryzen 7 8840HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMERyzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 3250U and Ryzen 7 8840HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 3250U and Ryzen 7 8840HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1200 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 3250U and Ryzen 7 8840HS.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1220

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 3250U 2.40
Ryzen 7 8840HS 15.23
+535%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 3250U 3812
Ryzen 7 8840HS 24195
+535%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 3 3250U 748
Ryzen 7 8840HS 2061
+176%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 3 3250U 1455
Ryzen 7 8840HS 9074
+524%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 3 3250U 353
Ryzen 7 8840HS 2045
+479%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 3 3250U 122
Ryzen 7 8840HS 268
+120%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 3 3250U 1662
Ryzen 7 8840HS 9949
+499%

Blender(-)

Ryzen 3 3250U 1399
+503%
Ryzen 7 8840HS 232

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 3 3250U 824
Ryzen 7 8840HS 1942
+136%

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 3 3250U 3291
Ryzen 7 8840HS 6205
+88.5%

7-Zip

Ryzen 3 3250U 9063
Ryzen 7 8840HS 60670
+569%

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 3 3250U 140
Ryzen 7 8840HS 308
+120%

CrossMark Overall

Ryzen 3 3250U 624
Ryzen 7 8840HS 1658
+166%

WebXPRT 4 Overall

Ryzen 3 3250U 105
Ryzen 7 8840HS 248
+136%

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

Ryzen 3 3250U 2541
+578%
Ryzen 7 8840HS 375

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.40 15.23
Integrated graphics card 2.98 18.32
Recency 6 January 2020 6 December 2023
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 12 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen 3 3250U has 86.7% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 8840HS, on the other hand, has a 534.6% higher aggregate performance score, 514.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 200% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 8840HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 3250U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 3250U and Ryzen 7 8840HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
Ryzen 3 3250U
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
Ryzen 7 8840HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 2148 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3250U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 192 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 8840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 3250U or Ryzen 7 8840HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.