EPYC 7513 vs Ryzen 3 3200G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 3200G
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.48
EPYC 7513
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 200 Watt
37.32
+733%

EPYC 7513 outperforms Ryzen 3 3200G by a whopping 733% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 3200G and EPYC 7513 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking132883
Place by popularity42not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.9011.24
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3AMD EPYC
Power efficiency6.5217.66
Architecture codenamePicasso (2019−2022)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date7 July 2019 (5 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99$2,840

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7513 has 26% better value for money than Ryzen 3 3200G.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 3200G and EPYC 7513 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads464
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.65 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier3626
L1 cache96 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm7 nm+
Die size210 mm28x 81 mm2
Number of transistors4,940 million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 3200G and EPYC 7513 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketAM4SP3
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and EPYC 7513. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and EPYC 7513 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and EPYC 7513. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size64 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon Vega 8N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and EPYC 7513.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes20128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 3200G 4.48
EPYC 7513 37.32
+733%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 3200G 7124
EPYC 7513 59285
+732%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.48 37.32
Recency 7 July 2019 15 March 2021
Physical cores 4 32
Threads 4 64
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 200 Watt

Ryzen 3 3200G has 207.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7513, on the other hand, has a 733% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7513 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 3200G in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 3 3200G is a desktop processor while EPYC 7513 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 3200G and EPYC 7513, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
Ryzen 3 3200G
AMD EPYC 7513
EPYC 7513

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3199 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 7 votes

Rate EPYC 7513 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 3200G or EPYC 7513, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.