Ryzen 5 7640HS vs Ryzen 3 2200G

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 2200G
2018
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.25
Ryzen 5 7640HS
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 35 Watt
14.56
+243%

Ryzen 5 7640HS outperforms Ryzen 3 2200G by a whopping 243% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 2200G and Ryzen 5 7640HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1378495
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.79no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3no data
Power efficiency6.1939.37
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge (2017−2018)Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date8 January 2018 (6 years ago)January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 2200G and Ryzen 5 7640HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed3.5 GHz4.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz5 GHz
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache384 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die size209.78 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors4950 Million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 2200G and Ryzen 5 7640HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4FP8
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 2200G and Ryzen 5 7640HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTRyzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 2200G and Ryzen 5 7640HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 2200G and Ryzen 5 7640HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1100 MHz)AMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 2200G and Ryzen 5 7640HS.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1220

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 2200G 4.25
Ryzen 5 7640HS 14.56
+243%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 2200G 6754
Ryzen 5 7640HS 23129
+242%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 3 2200G 999
Ryzen 5 7640HS 2291
+129%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 3 2200G 2841
Ryzen 5 7640HS 9159
+222%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 3 2200G 577
Ryzen 5 7640HS 2079
+260%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 3 2200G 146
Ryzen 5 7640HS 271
+86.2%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 3 2200G 4882
Ryzen 5 7640HS 9355
+91.6%

Blender(-)

Ryzen 3 2200G 826
+237%
Ryzen 5 7640HS 245

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 3 2200G 1087
Ryzen 5 7640HS 1941
+78.6%

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 3 2200G 3948
Ryzen 5 7640HS 6465
+63.8%

7-Zip

Ryzen 3 2200G 14790
Ryzen 5 7640HS 54954
+272%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.25 14.56
Integrated graphics card 4.51 14.90
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 4 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen 5 7640HS has a 242.6% higher aggregate performance score, 230.4% faster integrated GPU, 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 7640HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 2200G in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 3 2200G is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 7640HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 2200G and Ryzen 5 7640HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Ryzen 3 2200G
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS
Ryzen 5 7640HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2329 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 2200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 504 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7640HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 2200G or Ryzen 5 7640HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.