Processor N150 vs Processor N97

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

Processor N97
2023
4 cores / 4 threads
3.13
+28.8%

Processor N97 outperforms Processor N150 by a significant 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17951973
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameAlder Lake-N (2023)Twin Lake (2024−2025)
Release date3 January 2023 (2 years ago)20 November 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Processor N97 and Processor N150 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cache96 KB (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Processor N97 and Processor N150 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 1264Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP) + 6 MB + 6 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Processor N97 and Processor N150. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++

Security technologies

Processor N97 and Processor N150 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Processor N97 and Processor N150 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Processor N97 and Processor N150. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channelDDR4, DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) ( - 1200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 730

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Processor N97 and Processor N150.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes99

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Processor N97 3.13
+28.8%
Processor N150 2.43

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Processor N97 5445
+8.6%
Processor N150 5016

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Processor N97 15323
+16.4%
Processor N150 13159

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Processor N97 16.82
+41%
Processor N150 23.72

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Processor N97 479
+13.4%
Processor N150 423

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Processor N97 161
+5.1%
Processor N150 153

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Processor N97 2.9
+23.4%
Processor N150 2.4

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Processor N97 35
+22.8%
Processor N150 28

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Processor N97 175
+25%
Processor N150 140

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Processor N97 2757
+6.9%
Processor N150 2579

7-Zip Single

Processor N97 4019
+4.1%
Processor N150 3859

7-Zip

Processor N97 13174
+17.9%
Processor N150 11171

CrossMark Overall

Processor N97 844
+18%
Processor N150 715

WebXPRT 4 Overall

Processor N97 145
+14.6%
Processor N150 127

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

Processor N97 2014
Processor N150 2429
+20.6%

Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core

Processor N97 3181
+6.7%
Processor N150 2980

Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core

Processor N97 1300
+4.1%
Processor N150 1249

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.13 2.43
Integrated graphics card 2.13 3.80
Recency 3 January 2023 20 November 2024

Processor N97 has a 28.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Processor N150, on the other hand, has 78.4% faster integrated GPU, and an age advantage of 1 year.

The Intel Processor N97 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Processor N150 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Processor N97
Processor N97
Intel Processor N150
Processor N150

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 365 votes

Rate Processor N97 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 59 votes

Rate Processor N150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Processor N97 and Processor N150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.