Processor U300E vs Processor N200
Primary details
Comparing Processor N200 and Processor U300E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2109 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Alder Lake-N | no data |
| Power efficiency | 24.61 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Alder Lake-N (2023) | Raptor Lake-U (2023) |
| Release date | 3 January 2023 (1 year ago) | 4 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $193 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Processor N200 and Processor U300E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 5 (Penta-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 6 |
| Base clock speed | 0.1 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Processor N200 and Processor U300E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1264 | Intel BGA 1744 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Processor N200 and Processor U300E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Processor N200 and Processor U300E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Processor N200 and Processor U300E are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Processor N200 and Processor U300E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz) | Intel UHD Graphics 48EU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Processor N200 and Processor U300E.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 9 | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 4 | 5 |
| Threads | 4 | 6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 15 Watt |
Processor N200 has 150% lower power consumption.
Processor U300E, on the other hand, has 25% more physical cores and 50% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Processor N200 and Processor U300E. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Processor N200 and Processor U300E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
