EPYC 9965 vs Processor N200

VS

Primary details

Comparing Processor N200 and EPYC 9965 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2109not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-Nno data
Power efficiency24.61no data
Architecture codenameAlder Lake-N (2023)Turin (2024)
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$193$14,813

Detailed specifications

Processor N200 and EPYC 9965 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)192
Threads4384
Base clock speed0.1 GHz2.25 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache96 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (shared)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Processor N200 and EPYC 9965 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketIntel BGA 1264SP5
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt500 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Processor N200 and EPYC 9965. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Processor N200 and EPYC 9965 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Processor N200 and EPYC 9965 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Processor N200 and EPYC 9965. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channelDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Processor N200 and EPYC 9965.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes9128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 January 2023 10 October 2024
Physical cores 4 192
Threads 4 384
Chip lithography 10 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 500 Watt

Processor N200 has 8233.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9965, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, 4700% more physical cores and 9500% more threads, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Processor N200 and EPYC 9965. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Processor N200 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9965 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Processor N200 and EPYC 9965, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Processor N200
Processor N200
AMD EPYC 9965
EPYC 9965

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 145 votes

Rate Processor N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 23 votes

Rate EPYC 9965 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Processor N200 or EPYC 9965, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.