Ryzen Embedded 8640U vs Processor 300
Primary details
Comparing Processor 300 and Ryzen Embedded 8640U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1319 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 9.27 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Hawk Point (2024) |
| Release date | 8 January 2024 (less than a year ago) | 2 April 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $82 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Processor 300 and Ryzen Embedded 8640U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 163 mm2 | 178 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 25,000 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Processor 300 and Ryzen Embedded 8640U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 1700 | FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 46 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Processor 300 and Ryzen Embedded 8640U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Processor 300 and Ryzen Embedded 8640U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Processor 300 and Ryzen Embedded 8640U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Processor 300 and Ryzen Embedded 8640U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics 710 | AMD Radeon 760M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Processor 300 and Ryzen Embedded 8640U.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 2.86 | 14.91 |
| Recency | 8 January 2024 | 2 April 2024 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 6 |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 46 Watt | 28 Watt |
Ryzen Embedded 8640U has 421.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 months, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, a 150% more advanced lithography process, and 64.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Processor 300 and Ryzen Embedded 8640U. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Processor 300 is a desktop processor while Ryzen Embedded 8640U is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Processor 300 and Ryzen Embedded 8640U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
