EPYC 9135 vs Processor 300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Processor 300
2024
2 cores / 4 threads, 46 Watt
4.51
EPYC 9135
2024
16 cores / 32 threads, 200 Watt
36.56
+711%

EPYC 9135 outperforms Processor 300 by a whopping 711% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Processor 300 and EPYC 9135 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking131996
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data29.26
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency9.2717.29
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Turin (2024)
Release date8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$82$1,214

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Processor 300 and EPYC 9135 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speed3.9 GHz3.65 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm4 nm
Die size163 mm22x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistorsno data16,630 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Processor 300 and EPYC 9135 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
Socket1700SP5
Power consumption (TDP)46 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Processor 300 and EPYC 9135. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Processor 300 and EPYC 9135 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Processor 300 and EPYC 9135 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Processor 300 and EPYC 9135. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 710N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Processor 300 and EPYC 9135.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Processor 300 4.51
EPYC 9135 36.56
+711%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Processor 300 7160
EPYC 9135 58070
+711%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.51 36.56
Recency 8 January 2024 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 4 32
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 46 Watt 200 Watt

Processor 300 has 334.8% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9135, on the other hand, has a 710.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9135 is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor 300 in performance tests.

Note that Processor 300 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9135 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Processor 300 and EPYC 9135, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Processor 300
Processor 300
AMD EPYC 9135
EPYC 9135

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 24 votes

Rate Processor 300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9135 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Processor 300 or EPYC 9135, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.