EPYC 4564P vs Processor 300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Processor 300
2024
2 cores / 4 threads, 46 Watt
4.51
EPYC 4564P
2024
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
39.68
+780%

EPYC 4564P outperforms Processor 300 by a whopping 780% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Processor 300 and EPYC 4564P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking131966
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data57.25
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency9.2722.08
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$82$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Processor 300 and EPYC 4564P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speed3.9 GHz4.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz5.7 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm5 nm
Die size163 mm22x 71 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data47 °C
Number of transistorsno data13,140 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Processor 300 and EPYC 4564P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket1700AM5
Power consumption (TDP)46 Watt170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Processor 300 and EPYC 4564P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Processor 300 and EPYC 4564P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Processor 300 and EPYC 4564P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Processor 300 and EPYC 4564P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 710AMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Processor 300 and EPYC 4564P.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes1628

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Processor 300 4.51
EPYC 4564P 39.68
+780%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Processor 300 7160
EPYC 4564P 63036
+780%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.51 39.68
Integrated graphics card 2.86 1.98
Recency 8 January 2024 21 May 2024
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 4 32
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 46 Watt 170 Watt

Processor 300 has 44.4% faster integrated GPU, and 269.6% lower power consumption.

EPYC 4564P, on the other hand, has a 779.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 4564P is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor 300 in performance tests.

Note that Processor 300 is a desktop processor while EPYC 4564P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Processor 300 and EPYC 4564P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Processor 300
Processor 300
AMD EPYC 4564P
EPYC 4564P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 24 votes

Rate Processor 300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 4564P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Processor 300 or EPYC 4564P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.