A6-3650 vs Pro A8-8600B

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pro A8-8600B
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.40
+5.3%
A6-3650
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 100 Watt
1.33

Pro A8-8600B outperforms A6-3650 by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pro A8-8600B and A6-3650 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22192264
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Carrizono data
Power efficiency3.721.24
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date3 June 2015 (9 years ago)30 June 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pro A8-8600B and A6-3650 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.6 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data228 mm2
Number of transistors3100 Million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pro A8-8600B and A6-3650 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4FM1
Power consumption (TDP)12-35 Watt100 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pro A8-8600B and A6-3650. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsHSA 1.0no data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVXAVX-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
RAID+-
HSA+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pro A8-8600B and A6-3650 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pro A8-8600B and A6-3650. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3/DDR3L-2133DDR3
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R6 GraphicsRadeon HD 6530D
iGPU core count6no data
Number of pipelines384no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pro A8-8600B and A6-3650 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pro A8-8600B and A6-3650 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pro A8-8600B and A6-3650.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro A8-8600B 1.40
+5.3%
A6-3650 1.33

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pro A8-8600B 2190
+5.8%
A6-3650 2070

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Pro A8-8600B 440
+49.2%
A6-3650 295

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Pro A8-8600B 1011
+10.9%
A6-3650 912

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.40 1.33
Recency 3 June 2015 30 June 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 100 Watt

Pro A8-8600B has a 5.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 733.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Pro A8-8600B and A6-3650.

Be aware that Pro A8-8600B is a notebook processor while A6-3650 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pro A8-8600B and A6-3650, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Pro A8-8600B
Pro A8-8600B
AMD A6-3650
A6-3650

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 48 votes

Rate Pro A8-8600B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 73 votes

Rate A6-3650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pro A8-8600B or A6-3650, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.