A10-7400P vs Pro A8-8600B

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pro A8-8600B
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.38
+4.5%
A10-7400P
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.32

Pro A8-8600B outperforms A10-7400P by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pro A8-8600B and A10-7400P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22192249
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD CarrizoAMD Kaveri
Power efficiency3.733.57
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date3 June 2015 (9 years ago)4 June 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pro A8-8600B and A10-7400P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.4 GHz
L2 cache2048 KB4096 KB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data245 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data102 °C
Number of transistors3100 Million2410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pro A8-8600B and A10-7400P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP4FP3
Power consumption (TDP)12-35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pro A8-8600B and A10-7400P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsHSA 1.086x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4+
AVXAVX+
FRTC++
FreeSync+-
TrueAudio++
PowerNow++
PowerGating++
Out-of-band client management++
VirusProtect++
RAID+-
HSA++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pro A8-8600B and A10-7400P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pro A8-8600B and A10-7400P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3/DDR3L-2133DDR3-1866
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R6 GraphicsAMD Radeon R6 Graphics
iGPU core count66
Number of pipelines384384
Enduro++
Switchable graphics++
UVD++
VCE++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pro A8-8600B and A10-7400P integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pro A8-8600B and A10-7400P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12DirectX® 12
Vulkan++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pro A8-8600B and A10-7400P.

PCIe version3.03.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro A8-8600B 1.38
+4.5%
A10-7400P 1.32

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pro A8-8600B 2190
+4.3%
A10-7400P 2100

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Pro A8-8600B 440
+37.5%
A10-7400P 320

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Pro A8-8600B 1011
+45.3%
A10-7400P 696

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.38 1.32
Recency 3 June 2015 4 June 2014
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 35 Watt

Pro A8-8600B has a 4.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, and 191.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Pro A8-8600B and A10-7400P.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pro A8-8600B and A10-7400P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Pro A8-8600B
Pro A8-8600B
AMD A10-7400P
A10-7400P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 48 votes

Rate Pro A8-8600B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 11 votes

Rate A10-7400P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pro A8-8600B or A10-7400P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.