A10-5800B vs Pro A10-8700B
Aggregate performance score
A10-5800B outperforms Pro A10-8700B by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Pro A10-8700B and A10-5800B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2131 | 1881 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 2.55 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Carrizo | no data |
| Architecture codename | Carrizo (2015−2018) | Trinity (2012−2013) |
| Release date | 3 June 2015 (9 years ago) | 2 October 2012 (11 years ago) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Pro A10-8700B and A10-5800B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 246 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 74 °C |
| Number of transistors | 3100 Million | 1,178 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Pro A10-8700B and A10-5800B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FP4 BGA | FM2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 - 35 Watt | 100 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pro A10-8700B and A10-5800B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | HSA 1.0 | no data |
| HSA | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pro A10-8700B and A10-5800B are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pro A10-8700B and A10-5800B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo) | AMD Radeon HD 7660D |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
A10-5800B outperforms Pro A10-8700B by 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
A10-5800B outperforms Pro A10-8700B by 37% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 41%
Pro A10-8700B outperforms A10-5800B by 12% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 41%
A10-5800B outperforms Pro A10-8700B by 4% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.43 | 1.96 |
| Integrated graphics card | 1.47 | 1.30 |
| Recency | 3 June 2015 | 2 October 2012 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 100 Watt |
Pro A10-8700B has 13.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 733.3% lower power consumption.
A10-5800B, on the other hand, has a 37.1% higher aggregate performance score.
The A10-5800B is our recommended choice as it beats the Pro A10-8700B in performance tests.
Be aware that Pro A10-8700B is a notebook processor while A10-5800B is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pro A10-8700B and A10-5800B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
