Athlon 300U vs Phenom X4 9650

VS

Aggregate performance score

Phenom X4 9650
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.10
Athlon 300U
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.48
+125%

Athlon 300U outperforms Phenom X4 9650 by a whopping 125% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Phenom X4 9650 and Athlon 300U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24021756
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Athlon
Power efficiency1.0815.36
Architecture codenameAgena (2007−2008)Raven Ridge 2 (2019)
Release dateMarch 2008 (16 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Phenom X4 9650 and Athlon 300U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Multiplierno data24
L1 cache128 KB (per core)192 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Die size285 mm2209.78 mm2
Number of transistors450 million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Phenom X4 9650 and Athlon 300U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM2+FP5
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom X4 9650 and Athlon 300U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom X4 9650 and Athlon 300U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom X4 9650 and Athlon 300U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom X4 9650 and Athlon 300U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Phenom X4 9650 1.10
Athlon 300U 2.48
+125%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Phenom X4 9650 1721
Athlon 300U 3867
+125%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.10 2.48
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 15 Watt

Phenom X4 9650 has 100% more physical cores.

Athlon 300U, on the other hand, has a 125.5% higher aggregate performance score, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.

The Athlon 300U is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom X4 9650 in performance tests.

Note that Phenom X4 9650 is a desktop processor while Athlon 300U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom X4 9650 and Athlon 300U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom X4 9650
Phenom X4 9650
AMD Athlon 300U
Athlon 300U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 224 votes

Rate Phenom X4 9650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 457 votes

Rate Athlon 300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom X4 9650 or Athlon 300U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.