Pro A12-8800B vs Phenom II X6 1100T BE

VS

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X6 1100T BE
2010
6 cores / 6 threads, 125 Watt
3.62
+123%
Pro A12-8800B
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.62

Phenom II X6 1100T BE outperforms Pro A12-8800B by a whopping 123% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X6 1100T BE and Pro A12-8800B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14932080
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Carrizo
Power efficiency2.744.38
Architecture codenameThuban (2010)Carrizo (2015−2018)
Release date7 December 2010 (13 years ago)3 June 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X6 1100T BE and Pro A12-8800B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads64
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512 KB (per core)2048 KB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die size346 mm2no data
Number of transistors904 million3100 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X6 1100T BE and Pro A12-8800B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3FP4
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt12-35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X6 1100T BE and Pro A12-8800B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataHSA 1.0
AES-NI-+
FMA-FMA4
AVX-AVX
FreeSync-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
RAID-+
HSA-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X6 1100T BE and Pro A12-8800B are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X6 1100T BE and Pro A12-8800B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3/DDR3L-2133
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data8
Number of pipelinesno data512
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Phenom II X6 1100T BE and Pro A12-8800B integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Phenom II X6 1100T BE and Pro A12-8800B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X6 1100T BE and Pro A12-8800B.

PCIe version2.03.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Phenom II X6 1100T BE 3.62
+123%
Pro A12-8800B 1.62

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Phenom II X6 1100T BE 5745
+123%
Pro A12-8800B 2580

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.62 1.62
Recency 7 December 2010 3 June 2015
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 6 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 12 Watt

Phenom II X6 1100T BE has a 123.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Pro A12-8800B, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 941.7% lower power consumption.

The Phenom II X6 1100T BE is our recommended choice as it beats the Pro A12-8800B in performance tests.

Note that Phenom II X6 1100T BE is a desktop processor while Pro A12-8800B is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X6 1100T BE and Pro A12-8800B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X6 1100T BE
Phenom II X6 1100T BE
AMD Pro A12-8800B
Pro A12-8800B

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 457 votes

Rate Phenom II X6 1100T BE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 5 votes

Rate Pro A12-8800B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X6 1100T BE or Pro A12-8800B, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.