A8-7600 vs Phenom II X6 1100T BE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X6 1100T BE
2010
6 cores / 6 threads, 125 Watt
3.62
+78.3%
A8-7600
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.03

Phenom II X6 1100T BE outperforms A8-7600 by an impressive 78% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X6 1100T BE and A8-7600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15061923
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.742.96
Architecture codenameThuban (2010)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date7 December 2010 (14 years ago)31 July 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X6 1100T BE and A8-7600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads64
Base clock speed3.3 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)4096 KB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die size346 mm2245 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data71 °C
Number of transistors904 million2,411 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X6 1100T BE and A8-7600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X6 1100T BE and A8-7600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
DualGraphics-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
HSA-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X6 1100T BE and A8-7600 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X6 1100T BE and A8-7600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-2133
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data6
จำนวนพาธไลน์no data384
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Phenom II X6 1100T BE and A8-7600 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Phenom II X6 1100T BE and A8-7600 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X6 1100T BE and A8-7600.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Phenom II X6 1100T BE 3.62
+78.3%
A8-7600 2.03

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Phenom II X6 1100T BE 5745
+78.6%
A8-7600 3217

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.62 2.03
Recency 7 December 2010 31 July 2014
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 6 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 65 Watt

Phenom II X6 1100T BE has a 78.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

A8-7600, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 92.3% lower power consumption.

The Phenom II X6 1100T BE is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-7600 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X6 1100T BE and A8-7600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X6 1100T BE
Phenom II X6 1100T BE
AMD A8-7600
A8-7600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 459 votes

Rate Phenom II X6 1100T BE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 334 votes

Rate A8-7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X6 1100T BE or A8-7600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.