Ryzen 3 3250U vs Phenom II X6 1075T

VS

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X6 1075T
2010
6 cores / 6 threads, 125 Watt
2.16
Ryzen 3 3250U
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.40
+11.1%

Ryzen 3 3250U outperforms Phenom II X6 1075T by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X6 1075T and Ryzen 3 3250U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18581783
Place by popularitynot in top-10080
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.22no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency1.6415.14
Architecture codenameThuban (2010)Picasso (2019−2022)
Release date21 September 2010 (14 years ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$260no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X6 1075T and Ryzen 3 3250U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads64
Base clock speed3 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplierno data26
L1 cache128 KB (per core)192 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size346 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors904 million4500 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X6 1075T and Ryzen 3 3250U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3FP5
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X6 1075T and Ryzen 3 3250U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X6 1075T and Ryzen 3 3250U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X6 1075T and Ryzen 3 3250U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1200 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X6 1075T and Ryzen 3 3250U.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Phenom II X6 1075T 2.16
Ryzen 3 3250U 2.40
+11.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Phenom II X6 1075T 3438
Ryzen 3 3250U 3812
+10.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.16 2.40
Recency 21 September 2010 6 January 2020
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 6 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 15 Watt

Phenom II X6 1075T has 200% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Ryzen 3 3250U, on the other hand, has a 11.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 733.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 3250U is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X6 1075T in performance tests.

Note that Phenom II X6 1075T is a desktop processor while Ryzen 3 3250U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X6 1075T and Ryzen 3 3250U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X6 1075T
Phenom II X6 1075T
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
Ryzen 3 3250U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 280 votes

Rate Phenom II X6 1075T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 2148 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3250U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X6 1075T or Ryzen 3 3250U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.