Sempron 3000+ vs Phenom II X4 X920 BE
Aggregate performance score
Phenom II X4 X920 BE outperforms Sempron 3000+ by a whopping 668% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Sempron 3000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2166 | 3236 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | 4x AMD Phenom II | no data |
| Power efficiency | 3.07 | 0.29 |
| Architecture codename | Champlain (2010−2011) | Palermo (2001−2005) |
| Release date | 12 May 2010 (14 years ago) | 1 October 2005 (19 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $50 |
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Sempron 3000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | 3600 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 128 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | no data | 144 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 63 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Sempron 3000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | S1 | 939 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 62 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Sempron 3000+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | HyperTransport 3.0, Enhanced Virus Protection, AMD64, SSE4A, unlocked multiplier | no data |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Sempron 3000+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.46 | 0.19 |
| Recency | 12 May 2010 | 1 October 2005 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 62 Watt |
Phenom II X4 X920 BE has a 668.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 188.9% more advanced lithography process, and 37.8% lower power consumption.
The Phenom II X4 X920 BE is our recommended choice as it beats the Sempron 3000+ in performance tests.
Be aware that Phenom II X4 X920 BE is a notebook processor while Sempron 3000+ is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Sempron 3000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
