Celeron J3455 vs Phenom II X4 X920 BE

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X4 X920 BE
2010
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
1.46
+2.8%
Celeron J3455
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.42

Phenom II X4 X920 BE outperforms Celeron J3455 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Celeron J3455 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21782206
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.22
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Series4x AMD Phenom IIIntel Celeron
Power efficiency3.0713.43
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
Release date12 May 2010 (14 years ago)30 August 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Celeron J3455 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speedno data1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHzno data
Multiplierno data15
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache2 MB2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Celeron J3455 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketS1FCBGA1296
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Celeron J3455. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsHyperTransport 3.0, Enhanced Virus Protection, AMD64, SSE4A, unlocked multiplierno data
AES-NI-+
VirusProtect+-
vProno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Smart Connectno data-
HD Audiono data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Celeron J3455 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
OS Guardno data-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Celeron J3455 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
VT-ino data-
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Celeron J3455. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 500
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data750 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Celeron J3455 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Celeron J3455 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data+
OpenGLno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Celeron J3455.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data6
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.46 1.42
Recency 12 May 2010 30 August 2016
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 10 Watt

Phenom II X4 X920 BE has a 2.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron J3455, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 350% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Celeron J3455.

Be aware that Phenom II X4 X920 BE is a notebook processor while Celeron J3455 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Celeron J3455, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X4 X920 BE
Phenom II X4 X920 BE
Intel Celeron J3455
Celeron J3455

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 12 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 X920 BE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 229 votes

Rate Celeron J3455 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X4 X920 BE or Celeron J3455, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.