Atom Z2760 vs Phenom II X4 P920

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X4 P920 and Atom Z2760 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2560not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series4x AMD Phenom IIno data
Power efficiency3.22no data
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Cloverview (2012)
Release date12 May 2010 (14 years ago)27 September 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X4 P920 and Atom Z2760 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speedno data1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHzno data
L1 cache512 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data65 mm2
Number of transistorsno data140 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X4 P920 and Atom Z2760 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketS1 (S1g4)FC-MB4760
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt3 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 P920 and Atom Z2760. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow, SSE (1,2,3,4A), AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, HyperTransport 3.0no data
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 P920 and Atom Z2760 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 P920 and Atom Z2760. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2
Maximum memory sizeno data2.4 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataPowerVR SGX545 (533 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Phenom II X4 P920 1395
+132%
Atom Z2760 602

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Phenom II X4 P920 5042
+197%
Atom Z2760 1697

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Phenom II X4 P920 2083
+120%
Atom Z2760 945

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Phenom II X4 P920 24
+142%
Atom Z2760 58.13

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Phenom II X4 P920 2
+242%
Atom Z2760 1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 May 2010 27 September 2012
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 3 Watt

Phenom II X4 P920 has 100% more physical cores.

Atom Z2760, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 733.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Phenom II X4 P920 and Atom Z2760. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 P920 and Atom Z2760, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X4 P920
Phenom II X4 P920
Intel Atom Z2760
Atom Z2760

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 35 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 P920 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 15 votes

Rate Atom Z2760 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X4 P920 or Atom Z2760, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.