Atom N2650 vs Phenom II X4 N970
Primary details
Comparing Phenom II X4 N970 and Atom N2650 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2449 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 4x AMD Phenom II | Intel Atom |
| Power efficiency | 2.81 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Champlain (2010−2011) | Cedarview-M (2011−2012) |
| Release date | 16 December 2010 (14 years ago) | 5 January 2012 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X4 N970 and Atom N2650 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 1.73 GHz |
| Bus rate | 3600 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X4 N970 and Atom N2650 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | S1 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 3,6 Watt |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 (400 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 16 December 2010 | 5 January 2012 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 3 Watt |
Phenom II X4 N970 has 100% more physical cores.
Atom N2650, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 1066.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Phenom II X4 N970 and Atom N2650. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 N970 and Atom N2650, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
