Ryzen 7 5825U vs Phenom II X4 980 BE
Primary details
Comparing Phenom II X4 980 BE and Ryzen 7 5825U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 681 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000) |
| Power efficiency | no data | 72.87 |
| Architecture codename | Deneb (2009−2011) | Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022) |
| Release date | 3 May 2011 (13 years ago) | 6 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X4 980 BE and Ryzen 7 5825U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 258 mm2 | 180 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 758 million | 10,700 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X4 980 BE and Ryzen 7 5825U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM3 | FP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 980 BE and Ryzen 7 5825U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 980 BE and Ryzen 7 5825U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 980 BE and Ryzen 7 5825U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 2000 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X4 980 BE and Ryzen 7 5825U.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 3 May 2011 | 6 January 2022 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 8 |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen 7 5825U has an age advantage of 10 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 733.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Phenom II X4 980 BE and Ryzen 7 5825U. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Phenom II X4 980 BE is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 5825U is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 980 BE and Ryzen 7 5825U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
