MediaTek Kompanio 520 vs Phenom II X4 955 (95W)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X4 955 (95W) and MediaTek Kompanio 520 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1921
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataMediaTek Kompanio 500
Power efficiencyno data0.09
Architecture codenameDeneb (2009−2011)2x Cortex-A76 / 6x A55
Release date1 April 2009 (15 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X4 955 (95W) and MediaTek Kompanio 520 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed3.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache6 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm
Die size258 mm2no data
Number of transistors758 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X4 955 (95W) and MediaTek Kompanio 520 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3no data
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt2000 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 955 (95W) and MediaTek Kompanio 520 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 955 (95W) and MediaTek Kompanio 520. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X4 955 (95W) and MediaTek Kompanio 520.

PCIe version2.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 2000 Watt

Phenom II X4 955 (95W) has 2005.3% lower power consumption.

MediaTek Kompanio 520, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Phenom II X4 955 (95W) and MediaTek Kompanio 520. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Phenom II X4 955 (95W) is a desktop processor while MediaTek Kompanio 520 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 955 (95W) and MediaTek Kompanio 520, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X4 955 (95W)
Phenom II X4 955 (95W)
MediaTek Kompanio 520
Kompanio 520

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 814 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 955 (95W) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 34 votes

Rate MediaTek Kompanio 520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X4 955 (95W) or MediaTek Kompanio 520, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.