Ryzen 5 3600X vs Phenom II X4 925

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X4 925
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.43
Ryzen 5 3600X
2019
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
11.45
+701%

Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms Phenom II X4 925 by a whopping 701% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X4 925 and Ryzen 5 3600X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2199690
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.1518.84
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency1.4211.40
Architecture codenameDeneb (2009−2011)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date11 May 2009 (15 years ago)7 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$160$249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 3600X has 12460% better value for money than Phenom II X4 925.

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X4 925 and Ryzen 5 3600X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz4.4 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size258 mm2no data
Number of transistors758 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X4 925 and Ryzen 5 3600X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM3AM4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 925 and Ryzen 5 3600X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 925 and Ryzen 5 3600X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 925 and Ryzen 5 3600X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X4 925 and Ryzen 5 3600X.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Phenom II X4 925 1.43
Ryzen 5 3600X 11.45
+701%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Phenom II X4 925 2272
Ryzen 5 3600X 18184
+700%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Phenom II X4 925 322
Ryzen 5 3600X 1669
+418%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Phenom II X4 925 963
Ryzen 5 3600X 7089
+636%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.43 11.45
Recency 11 May 2009 7 July 2019
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 4 12
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm

Ryzen 5 3600X has a 700.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 3600X is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X4 925 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 925 and Ryzen 5 3600X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X4 925
Phenom II X4 925
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
Ryzen 5 3600X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 327 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 925 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 2809 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3600X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X4 925 or Ryzen 5 3600X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.