A6-7480 vs Phenom II X4 840

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X4 840
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.57
+30.8%

Phenom II X4 840 outperforms A6-7480 by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X4 840 and A6-7480 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21052341
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.08no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.502.43
Architecture codenamePropus (2009−2011)Carrizo (2015−2018)
Release date4 January 2011 (13 years ago)26 October 2018 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$90no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X4 840 and A6-7480 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)160K
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die size169 mm2250 mm2
Number of transistors300 million3,100 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X4 840 and A6-7480 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 840 and A6-7480. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 840 and A6-7480 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 840 and A6-7480. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-2133

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataRadeon R5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X4 840 and A6-7480.

PCIe version2.03.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Phenom II X4 840 1.57
+30.8%
A6-7480 1.20

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Phenom II X4 840 2401
+30.8%
A6-7480 1836

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.57 1.20
Recency 4 January 2011 26 October 2018
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 45 Watt

Phenom II X4 840 has a 30.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

A6-7480, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 111.1% lower power consumption.

The Phenom II X4 840 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-7480 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 840 and A6-7480, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X4 840
Phenom II X4 840
AMD A6-7480
A6-7480

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 245 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 155 votes

Rate A6-7480 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X4 840 or A6-7480, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.