i7-2610UE vs Phenom II X3 B75

VS

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X3 B75
2009
3 cores / 3 threads, 95 Watt
1.12
+16.7%
Core i7-2610UE
2 cores / 4 threads, 17 Watt
0.96

Phenom II X3 B75 outperforms Core i7-2610UE by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X3 B75 and Core i7-2610UE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24052505
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.02
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core i7
Power efficiency1.125.34
Architecture codenameHeka (2009−2010)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date1 October 2009 (15 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)no data$317

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X3 B75 and Core i7-2610UE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores3 (Tri-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads34
Base clock speed3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rateno data4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data15
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size258 mm2no data
Number of transistors758 million624 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X3 B75 and Core i7-2610UE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM3no data
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X3 B75 and Core i7-2610UE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

Phenom II X3 B75 and Core i7-2610UE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X3 B75 and Core i7-2610UE are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X3 B75 and Core i7-2610UE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1333
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.335 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Intel HD Graphics 3000

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X3 B75 and Core i7-2610UE.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Phenom II X3 B75 1.12
+16.7%
i7-2610UE 0.96

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Phenom II X3 B75 1781
+16.6%
i7-2610UE 1527

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.12 0.96
Physical cores 3 2
Threads 3 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 17 Watt

Phenom II X3 B75 has a 16.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores.

i7-2610UE, on the other hand, has 33.3% more threads, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 458.8% lower power consumption.

The Phenom II X3 B75 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-2610UE in performance tests.

Note that Phenom II X3 B75 is a desktop processor while Core i7-2610UE is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X3 B75 and Core i7-2610UE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X3 B75
Phenom II X3 B75
Intel Core i7-2610UE
Core i7-2610UE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 32 votes

Rate Phenom II X3 B75 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Core i7-2610UE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X3 B75 or Core i7-2610UE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.