Celeron Dual-Core T3300 vs Pentium T4400

VS

Primary details

Comparing Pentium T4400 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron Dual-Core
Architecture codenameno dataPenryn (2008−2011)
Release date1 October 2009 (15 years ago)1 February 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium T4400 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data2 (Dual-core)
Threadsno data2
Base clock speed2.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium T4400 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPGA478Socket P 478
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium T4400 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Pentium T4400 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium T4400 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium T4400 775
+22.4%
Celeron Dual-Core T3300 633

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2009 1 February 2010

Celeron Dual-Core T3300 has an age advantage of 4 months.

We couldn't decide between Pentium T4400 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium T4400 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium T4400
Pentium T4400
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3300
Celeron Dual-Core T3300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 28 votes

Rate Pentium T4400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 35 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium T4400 or Celeron Dual-Core T3300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.