Celeron N4100 vs Pentium M 765
Primary details
Comparing Pentium M 765 and Celeron N4100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | not rated | 2036 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Pentium M | Intel Celeron |
Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | Goldmont Plus (2017) |
Release date | October 2004 (19 years ago) | 11 December 2017 (6 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $107 |
Detailed specifications
Pentium M 765 and Celeron N4100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 1 | 4 |
Boost clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
Bus support | 400 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | 32 KB | 256 KB |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 4 MB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | 84 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
Number of transistors | 140 million | no data |
64 bit support | - | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium M 765 and Celeron N4100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
Socket | 479 | BGA1090 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 21 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 765 and Celeron N4100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 765 and Celeron N4100 are enumerated here.
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 765 and Celeron N4100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 8 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 38.397 GB/s |
ECC memory support | - | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium M 765 and Celeron N4100.
PCI Express lanes | no data | 6 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Celeron N4100 outperforms Pentium M 765 by 10% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 18%
Celeron N4100 outperforms Pentium M 765 by 225% in 3DMark06 CPU.
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
Threads | 1 | 4 |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 21 Watt | 6 Watt |
Celeron N4100 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 250% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Pentium M 765 and Celeron N4100. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 765 and Celeron N4100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.