EPYC 7313 vs Pentium M 735
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7313 outperforms Pentium M 735 by a whopping 13283% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Pentium M 735 and EPYC 7313 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3317 | 224 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 16.60 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Pentium M | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | 0.82 | 14.80 |
| Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| Release date | 10 May 2004 (20 years ago) | 15 March 2021 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $1,083 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Pentium M 735 and EPYC 7313 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 1.7 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.7 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 30 |
| L1 cache | 32 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 7 nm+ |
| Die size | 87 mm2 | 4x 81 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 144 million | 16,600 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| VID voltage range | 0.988V-1.34V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium M 735 and EPYC 7313 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | PPGA478 | SP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7.5 Watt | 155 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 735 and EPYC 7313. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Pentium M 735 and EPYC 7313 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 735 and EPYC 7313 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 735 and EPYC 7313. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TiB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 204.795 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium M 735 and EPYC 7313.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.18 | 24.09 |
| Recency | 10 May 2004 | 15 March 2021 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 16 |
| Threads | 1 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7 Watt | 155 Watt |
Pentium M 735 has 2114.3% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7313, on the other hand, has a 13283.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.
The EPYC 7313 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium M 735 in performance tests.
Be aware that Pentium M 735 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7313 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
