Ryzen 3 3350U vs Pentium M 705
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 3 3350U outperforms Pentium M 705 by a whopping 2340% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Pentium M 705 and Ryzen 3 3350U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3308 | 1500 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Pentium M | Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) |
| Power efficiency | 0.58 | 23.08 |
| Architecture codename | Banias (2003) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| Release date | no data | 6 January 2019 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Pentium M 705 and Ryzen 3 3350U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 1 MB L2 KB | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 12 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4500 Million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| VID voltage range | 0.956V-1.484V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium M 705 and Ryzen 3 3350U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | H-PBGA479, PPGA478 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 24.5 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 705 and Ryzen 3 3350U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Pentium M 705 and Ryzen 3 3350U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 705 and Ryzen 3 3350U are enumerated here.
| VT-x | - | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.15 | 3.66 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 24 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen 3 3350U has a 2340% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 983.3% more advanced lithography process, and 60% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen 3 3350U is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium M 705 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 705 and Ryzen 3 3350U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
