Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U vs Pentium M 1.40

Primary details

Comparing Pentium M 1.40 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated553
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiencyno data84.54
Architecture codenameBanias (2003)Phoenix (Zen4) (2023)
Release dateMarch 2003 (21 year ago)23 May 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium M 1.40 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads112
Base clock speedno data3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cache16 KB384 KB
L2 cache1 MB6 MB
L3 cache0 KB16 MB
Chip lithography130 nm4 nm
Die size100 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors77 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Pentium M 1.40 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket478no data
Power consumption (TDP)24 Watt15 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 1.40 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 760M

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium M 1.40 225
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U 21287
+9361%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 6
Threads 1 12
Chip lithography 130 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 24 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U has 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, a 3150% more advanced lithography process, and 60% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Pentium M 1.40 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 1.40 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium M 1.40
Pentium M 1.40
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Pentium M 1.40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium M 1.40 or Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.