i3-N300 vs Pentium J2900

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium J2900
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
0.79
Core i3-N300
2023
8 cores / 8 threads, 7 Watt
5.35
+577%

Core i3-N300 outperforms Pentium J2900 by a whopping 577% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium J2900 and Core i3-N300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26321178
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Pentiumno data
Power efficiency7.4772.28
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date1 November 2013 (11 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$94$309

Detailed specifications

Pentium J2900 and Core i3-N300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed2.41 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.66 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache224 KB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB2 MB (per module)
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Pentium J2900 and Core i3-N300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt7 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium J2900 and Core i3-N300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI-no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Pentium J2900 and Core i3-N300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium J2900 and Core i3-N300 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium J2900 and Core i3-N300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.3 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 SeriesIntel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) ( - 1250 MHz)
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency896 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium J2900 and Core i3-N300 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pentium J2900 and Core i3-N300 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium J2900 and Core i3-N300.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes49
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium J2900 0.79
i3-N300 5.35
+577%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium J2900 1250
i3-N300 8497
+580%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.79 5.35
Integrated graphics card 0.77 3.29
Recency 1 November 2013 3 January 2023
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 22 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 7 Watt

i3-N300 has a 577.2% higher aggregate performance score, 327.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 120% more advanced lithography process, and 42.9% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-N300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium J2900 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium J2900 and Core i3-N300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium J2900
Pentium J2900
Intel Core i3-N300
Core i3-N300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 78 votes

Rate Pentium J2900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 78 votes

Rate Core i3-N300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium J2900 or Core i3-N300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.