i3-330E vs Pentium J2900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium J2900
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
0.79
Core i3-330E
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.79

Primary details

Comparing Pentium J2900 and Core i3-330E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26162608
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel PentiumIntel Core i3
Power efficiency7.482.14
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Westmere (2010−2011)
Release date1 November 2013 (11 years ago)7 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$94$177

Detailed specifications

Pentium J2900 and Core i3-330E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.41 GHz2.13 GHz
Boost clock speed2.66 GHz0.03 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 1.0
Bus rateno data1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplierno data16
L1 cache224 KB128 KB
L2 cache2 MB512 KB
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache3 MB
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data81 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C90 °C for rPGA,105 °C for BGA
Number of transistorsno data382 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium J2900 and Core i3-330E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1170BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium J2900 and Core i3-330E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
FMA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
PAE36 Bit36 Bit
FDI-+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
RST-no data

Security technologies

Pentium J2900 and Core i3-330E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDB++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium J2900 and Core i3-330E are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium J2900 and Core i3-330E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-800, DDR3-1066
Maximum memory size8 GB8.79 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.3 GB/s17.051 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 SeriesIntel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processors
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequency896 MHz667 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium J2900 and Core i3-330E integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported22

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pentium J2900 and Core i3-330E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium J2900 and Core i3-330E.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes416
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium J2900 0.79
i3-330E 0.79

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium J2900 1249
i3-330E 1260
+0.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2013 7 January 2010
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 35 Watt

Pentium J2900 has an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 250% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Pentium J2900 and Core i3-330E.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium J2900 and Core i3-330E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium J2900
Pentium J2900
Intel Core i3-330E
Core i3-330E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 78 votes

Rate Pentium J2900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Core i3-330E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium J2900 or Core i3-330E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.