Xeon W-3275M vs Pentium III 1133

Primary details

Comparing Pentium III 1133 and Xeon W-3275M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated197
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.02
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon W
Power efficiencyno data11.55
Architecture codenameTualatin (2000−2002)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release dateJuly 2000 (24 years ago)3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$7,453

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium III 1133 and Xeon W-3275M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads156
Base clock speedno data2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.13 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data25
L1 cache8 KB1.75 MB
L2 cache256 KB28 MB
L3 cache0 KB38.5 MB
Chip lithography180 nm14 nm
Die size80 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data76 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)69 °Cno data
Number of transistors44 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Pentium III 1133 and Xeon W-3275M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
Socket370FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)29 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium III 1133 and Xeon W-3275M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Pentium III 1133 and Xeon W-3275M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium III 1133 and Xeon W-3275M are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium III 1133 and Xeon W-3275M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-2933
Maximum memory sizeno data2 TB
Max memory channelsno data6
Maximum memory bandwidthno data140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium III 1133 and Xeon W-3275M.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium III 1133 284
Xeon W-3275M 39736
+13892%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 28
Threads 1 56
Chip lithography 180 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 29 Watt 205 Watt

Pentium III 1133 has 606.9% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3275M, on the other hand, has 2700% more physical cores and 5500% more threads, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Pentium III 1133 and Xeon W-3275M. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Pentium III 1133 is a desktop processor while Xeon W-3275M is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium III 1133 and Xeon W-3275M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium III 1133
Pentium III 1133
Intel Xeon W-3275M
Xeon W-3275M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 62 votes

Rate Pentium III 1133 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 64 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium III 1133 or Xeon W-3275M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.