Celeron G1610 vs Pentium G840

Primary details

Comparing Pentium G840 and Celeron G1610 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	2604	2494
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.61	0.01
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Power efficiency	1.16	1.64
Architecture codename	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date	22 May 2011 (13 years ago)	3 December 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$60	$388

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Pentium G840 has 46000% better value for money than Celeron G1610.

Detailed specifications

Pentium G840 and Celeron G1610 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	2	2
Base clock speed	2.8 GHz	2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.8 GHz	2.6 GHz
Bus rate	no data	5 GT/s
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	64 KB (per core)
L2 cache	256 KB (per core)	256 KB (per core)
L3 cache	3 MB (shared)	2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	32 nm	22 nm
Die size	131 mm2	94 mm2
Maximum core temperature	69 °C	no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	no data	65 °C
Number of transistors	504 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Pentium G840 and Celeron G1610 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FCLGA1155	FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G840 and Celeron G1610. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI	+	-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
My WiFi	no data	-
Turbo Boost Technology	-	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	-
Idle States	+	+
Thermal Monitoring	+	+
Flex Memory Access	+	no data
FDI	+	no data
Fast Memory Access	+	no data

Security technologies

Pentium G840 and Celeron G1610 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	-
EDB	+	+
Secure Key	no data	-
Anti-Theft	no data	-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G840 and Celeron G1610 are enumerated here.

VT-d	-	-
VT-x	+	+
EPT	+	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G840 and Celeron G1610. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR3
Maximum memory size	32 GB	32 GB
Max memory channels	2	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	21 GB/s	21 GB/s
ECC memory support	-	+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors	Intel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® Processors
Clear Video HD	-	-
Graphics max frequency	1.1 GHz	1.05 GHz
InTru 3D	-	-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium G840 and Celeron G1610 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

2

3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G840 and Celeron G1610.

PCIe version

2.0

2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	0.81	0.97
Recency	22 May 2011	3 December 2012
Chip lithography	32 nm	22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	55 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G840 and Celeron G1610, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---