Atom Z3735G vs Pentium G4400
Primary details
Comparing Pentium G4400 and Atom Z3735G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2084 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.61 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | Intel Pentium | no data |
Power efficiency | 3.01 | no data |
Architecture codename | Skylake (2015−2016) | Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) |
Release date | 1 September 2015 (9 years ago) | 9 April 2014 (10 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $64 | $17 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Pentium G4400 and Atom Z3735G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 1.33 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 1.83 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 33 | no data |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 56K (per core) |
L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 2 MB |
L3 cache | 3 MB | 2 MB L2 Cache |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 22 nm |
Die size | 150 mm2 | 112 mm2 |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 65 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 1,400 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium G4400 and Atom Z3735G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | FCLGA1151 | UTFCBGA592 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 54 Watt | 2 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G4400 and Atom Z3735G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Security technologies
Pentium G4400 and Atom Z3735G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Secure Key | + | no data |
Identity Protection | + | - |
SGX | Yes with Intel® ME | no data |
OS Guard | - | no data |
Anti-Theft | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G4400 and Atom Z3735G are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G4400 and Atom Z3735G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | DDR3 |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 1 GB |
Max memory channels | 2 | 1 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.134 GB/s | 5.3 GB/s |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 510 | Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series |
Max video memory | 64 GB | no data |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Clear Video | + | no data |
Clear Video HD | + | no data |
Graphics max frequency | 1 GHz | 646 MHz |
InTru 3D | + | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Pentium G4400 and Atom Z3735G integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
eDP | + | no data |
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
DVI | + | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Pentium G4400 and Atom Z3735G integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
4K resolution support | + | no data |
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | no data |
Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | no data |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | no data |
Max resolution over VGA | N/A | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Pentium G4400 and Atom Z3735G integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | 12 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.4 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G4400 and Atom Z3735G.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 September 2015 | 9 April 2014 |
Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
Threads | 2 | 4 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 22 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 54 Watt | 2 Watt |
Pentium G4400 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.
Atom Z3735G, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 2600% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Pentium G4400 and Atom Z3735G. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Pentium G4400 is a desktop processor while Atom Z3735G is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G4400 and Atom Z3735G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.