Celeron N4000 vs Pentium G3250

Aggregate performance score

Pentium G3250
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 53 Watt
1.25
+34.4%
Celeron N4000
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.93

Pentium G3250 outperforms Celeron N4000 by a substantial 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium G3250 and Celeron N4000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22962513
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.07no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency2.1914.67
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Goldmont Plus (2017)
Release date21 July 2014 (10 years ago)11 December 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$171$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium G3250 and Celeron N4000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3.2 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data11
L1 cache64 KB (per core)112 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)4 MB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size177 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 deg C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Pentium G3250 and Celeron N4000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1150FCBGA1090
Power consumption (TDP)53 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G3250 and Celeron N4000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Pentium G3250 and Celeron N4000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G3250 and Celeron N4000 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G3250 and Celeron N4000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.3 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel UHD Graphics 600
Max video memory1.7 GB8 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHz650 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium G3250 and Celeron N4000 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVI+no data
VGA+no data
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Pentium G3250 and Celeron N4000 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.41920x1080@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP2560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort2560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGA1920x1200@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pentium G3250 and Celeron N4000 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.1/1212
OpenGL4.34.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G3250 and Celeron N4000.

PCIe versionUp to 3.02.0
PCI Express lanes166
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium G3250 1.25
+34.4%
Celeron N4000 0.93

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium G3250 1991
+35.3%
Celeron N4000 1472

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Pentium G3250 583
+79.4%
Celeron N4000 325

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Pentium G3250 995
+88.4%
Celeron N4000 528

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.25 0.93
Recency 21 July 2014 11 December 2017
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 53 Watt 6 Watt

Pentium G3250 has a 34.4% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron N4000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 783.3% lower power consumption.

The Pentium G3250 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N4000 in performance tests.

Note that Pentium G3250 is a desktop processor while Celeron N4000 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G3250 and Celeron N4000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium G3250
Pentium G3250
Intel Celeron N4000
Celeron N4000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 322 votes

Rate Pentium G3250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 899 votes

Rate Celeron N4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium G3250 or Celeron N4000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.