Atom C3758 vs Pentium G3220

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium G3220
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 53 Watt
1.19
Atom C3758
2017
8 cores / 8 threads, 25 Watt
2.90
+144%

Atom C3758 outperforms Pentium G3220 by a whopping 144% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium G3220 and Atom C3758 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23411655
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.131.52
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiency2.0910.98
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)15 August 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$71$193

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Atom C3758 has 1069% better value for money than Pentium G3220.

Detailed specifications

Pentium G3220 and Atom C3758 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed3 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data22
L1 cache64 KB (per core)448 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)16 MB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size177 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data82 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium G3220 and Atom C3758 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1150FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)53 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G3220 and Atom C3758. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Pentium G3220 and Atom C3758 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G3220 and Atom C3758 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G3220 and Atom C3758. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4: 2400
Maximum memory size32 GB256 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.3 GB/s34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Max video memory1.7 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium G3220 and Atom C3758 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data
VGA+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Pentium G3220 and Atom C3758 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.41920x1080@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP2560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort2560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGA1920x1200@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pentium G3220 and Atom C3758 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.1/12no data
OpenGL4.3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G3220 and Atom C3758.

PCIe versionUp to 3.03
PCI Express lanes1616
USB revisionno data3
Total number of SATA portsno data16
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data16
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data4x10/2.5/1 GBE

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium G3220 1.19
Atom C3758 2.90
+144%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium G3220 1893
Atom C3758 4614
+144%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.19 2.90
Recency 1 September 2013 15 August 2017
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 53 Watt 25 Watt

Atom C3758 has a 143.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 112% lower power consumption.

The Atom C3758 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium G3220 in performance tests.

Note that Pentium G3220 is a desktop processor while Atom C3758 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G3220 and Atom C3758, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium G3220
Pentium G3220
Intel Atom C3758
Atom C3758

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 354 votes

Rate Pentium G3220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 4 votes

Rate Atom C3758 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium G3220 or Atom C3758, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.